iRobot Braava Jet 240 vs 380T: What Makes Them Different?

irobot braava jet 240 vs 380t
irobot braava jet 240 vs 380t

iRobot mops have been becoming increasingly popular because of their cleaning performance. Homeowners are amazed by iRobot Braava models, and you will get unmatched cleaning quality from these units. The Braava lineup might have a unique design, but they do bring extensive mopping and dusting coverage. So, if you’re in the market for a robot mop, go with some of the newer models from the Braava lineup.

You’ll find the majority of users sticking with options like iRobot Braava Jet 240 or 380T. So, if you’re unsure about where to start, here are some details on both of these models. You can’t go wrong with either one, and this information will help you further solidify the purchase decision.

iRobot Braava Jet 240 vs 380T

iRobot Braava Jet 240

The Braava Jet 240 features robust mopping performance and a better run time when compared with other options on the market. The design is not all that great, but you won’t have to worry about filling the tank again and again just to get through a single mopping cycle. So, if you’re looking for a unit that features a bigger tank, the better option here is to go with the Braava Jet 240. You’ll get used to its design, and it pairs up great with white tiles.

When compared with the 380T, you’ll immediately notice the difference in design and size. However, the core differences are related to the average run time and the number of cleaning modes. Jet 240 will bring you three modes, including damp and wet mop, where you won’t find these features in the standard 380T. On top of that, the run time with the Braava Jet is close to three hours.

You won’t have to deal with charging errors or low battery issues, even if your house is massive. However, one area in which the Braava jet lacks is coverage. It doesn’t cover as much region when brought next to Braava 380T, which has a bigger frame. So, keep that in mind before you pick the new mopping robot.

Overall, iRobot Braava Jet 240 is a great unit with a decent-sized water tank and amazing battery timing. The cleaning modes will be able to match the pad placement without any input from the users. Moreover, it is compact and brings a lighter weight while maintaining the same cleaning performance. So, stick with Jet 240 if you don’t mind a limited mopping and sweeping coverage.

Braava 380T

Braava 380T brings a bulky structure to the owners, and you will get extensive sweeping and mopping coverage with this unit. The battery timing might be a bit less when compared with the iRobot Braava Jet, but it comes through with its faster cleaning pace. So, you won’t notice a difference in the cleaning performance when you compare both of these units side by side.

However, when it comes to smart controls and the sprayer quality, Jet 240 will present itself as the better option. The 380T is primarily meant for cleaning hallways or larger regions in commercial spaces. You can’t expect a good single room performance when you bring it next to the 240 that is specifically designed for single room applications. So, keep that in mind as you evaluate your options.

If you don’t mind the bigger design of the Braava 380T and need it to clean larger halls, then it is the optimal fit for you. However, if you’re looking for more app control and remote access to the mopping bot, then going with the 240 Jet is the ideal option. It all comes down to what you’re looking for, and neither one of these devices has had any serious performance issues.

Overall, the majority of users like to stick with 240 Jet because of the smaller rooms in the house. However, if you have a bigger house or like the robot to clean the halls specifically, then 380T will perform far better than the basic 240T. So, instead of looking at the cleaning performance and the smart features, you should try to evaluate the cleaning region and then make the final decision accordingly on which device will better suit your home. Hopefully, that will be enough to help you find the perfect fit.

Leave a Comment